The Breast
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 214-218, June 2010

Intravenous versus oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. A retrospective comparison of two consecutive phase II studies

  • Vito Lorusso

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Medical Oncology Dept., Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy. Tel.: +39 8 3266 1981; fax: +39 8 3266 1962.
  • ,
  • Saverio Cinieri

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
    • Medical Oncology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Marianna Giampaglia

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
  • ,
  • Mariangela Ciccarese

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Tinelli

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
  • ,
  • Vincenzo Chiuri

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
  • ,
  • Corrado Manca

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy
  • ,
  • Nicola Silvestris

      Affiliations

    • Medical and Experimental Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Bari, Italy
  • ,
  • Giampiero Gasparini

      Affiliations

    • Medical Oncology Unit, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Colucci

      Affiliations

    • Medical and Experimental Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Bari, Italy

Received 8 June 2009; received in revised form 20 January 2010; accepted 20 January 2010. published online 18 February 2010.

Abstract 

Vinorelbine (i.v.) plus capecitabine (oral) combination therapy is active in anthracycline/taxane pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Availability of oral vinorelbine provides this combination in an all-oral formulation. Two consecutive phase II trials differing only in vinorelbine administration routes evaluated their respective activities and tolerabilities in this population. In the i.v. group (n = 38) disease control was 61% (37% PR, 24% SD), median TTP 6.8 months and median survival 11.3 months. In the oral group (n = 38) disease control was 77% (5.4% CR, 34% PR, 38% SD), median TTP 7 months and median survival 10 months. G3–G4 neutropenia was more common in the oral group (p < 0.05); G2–G3 anaemia [5] and G3 thrombocytopenia [1] were observed only in the oral group. Although the comparison between the two regimens was not randomized, the results observed in these two consecutive phase II studies may suggest that oral and iv vinorelbine, in combination with capecitabine, can achieve similar responses in patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthra–taxane combinations.

Keywords: Metastatic breast cancer, Capecitabine, Vinorelbine, Administration

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0960-9776(10)00017-2

doi:10.1016/j.breast.2010.01.015

The Breast
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 214-218, June 2010