« Previous
Next »
The Breast
Volume 19, Issue 4
, Pages 297-302
, August 2010
Challenges and economics of private breast cancer surgery practice
References
- . Cancer quality alliance: blueprint for a better cancer system. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:266–292
- . In search of excellence: exploring the economics of breast care. Semin Breast Dis. 2008;11:113–115
- National Quality Forum (NQF). NQF Endorsed Commission on Cancer (CoC) measures for quality of cancer care for breast and colorectal cancers. Available from: http://www.facs.org/cancer/qualitymeasures.html. [accessed February 20, 2010].
- The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Mastery of breast surgery pilot program. Available from: http://www.breastsurgeons.org/mastery/index.php [accessed December 15, 2009].
- Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144:455–462
- . Guidelines to assure quality in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:568–576
- . Defining quality of care for breast cancer: clinical challenges. Semin Breast Dis. 2007;10:121–127
- . Quality control in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:577–586
- . Interdisciplinary comprehensive breast tumor boards: their role in the comprehensive management of contemporary breast cancer. Semin Breast Dis. 2008;11:4–8
- . Detection, diagnosis, and treatment of early breast cancer requires creative interdisciplinary teamwork. Semin Breast Dis. 2005;8:4–9
- . Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer. 2006;107:2346–2351
- . Are “breast-focused” surgeons more competent?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:953–955
- . Invited commentary: comment from American Board of Surgery. Surgery. 2002;131:205–209
- Learning curves and breast cancer lymphatic mapping: institutional volume index. J Surg Res. 2001;97:92–96
- . Institutional learning curve for sentinel node biopsy at a community teaching hospital. Am Surg. 2001;67:1030–1033
- Learning curves for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping based on surgical volume analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:593–600
- . Practice patterns in breast cancer surgery: Canadian perspective. World J Surg. 2004;28:80–86
- . Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States. Cancer. 2004;101:1323–1329
- . Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter?. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3694–3698
- . Physician practice volume and alternative surgical treatment for breast cancer in Florida. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:166–179
- . Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:487–491
- . Conflicts in decision-making for breast cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2463–2469
- Surgeon characteristics and use of breast conservation surgery in women with early breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249:828–833
- . Variation in the management and survival of women under 50 years with breast cancer in the South East Thames region. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:751–757
- . Does it matter where you live?: treatment variation for breast cancer in Yorkshire. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:1275–1278
- . Provider case volume and outcome in the evaluation and treatment of patients with mammogram-detected breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:704–712
- Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551–1556
- Correlates of between-surgeon variation in breast cancer treatments. Med Care. 2006;44:609–616
- . Geographic and hospital variation in the management of older women with breast cancer. Cancer Control. 1994;1:334–338
- . Predictors of breast conservation therapy: size is not all that matters. Cancer. 2005;103:892–899
- . Managing the opposite breast: contralateral symmetry procedures. Cancer J. 2008;14:258–263
- . Oncoplastic techniques extend breast-conserving surgery to patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response unfit for conventional techniques. World J Surg. 2009;33:2082–2086
- . Clinical impact of oncoplastic surgery in a specialist breast practice. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:225–226
- . Correlated of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer. 2007;109:1715–1720
- . Does it matter where you go for breast cancer surgery?. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:15s;(suppl; abstr 6504)
- . Clinical trial priorities among surgeons caring for breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2008;195:474–480
- . Exploring the surgeon volume outcome relationship among women with breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1958–1963
- . Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110:349–356
- . Effects of specialization on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:36–42
- The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:280–285
- Correlates of between-surgeon variation in breast cancer treatments. Med Care. 2006;44:607–608
- Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:539–544
- . Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1996;312:145–148
- Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:606–615
- . The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:284–289
- . Breast cancer services – a population-based study of service reorganization. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27(2):171–175
- . Effect of surgical subspecialization on breast cancer outcome. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1420–1425
- . Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1920–1925
- . Specialization and breast cancer survival in the screening era. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1708–1712
- Surgeon characteristics and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:199–206
- . Is the performance of cancer services influenced more by hospital factors or by specialization?. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008;30:69–74
- . Improvement of breast practice in early breast cancer: actionable surgeon and hospital factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:219–226
- Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:271–276
- . High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: analysis of 233,247 patients. World J Surg. 2005;29:994–999
- . Breast cancer surgery: do all patients want to go to high-volume hospitals?. Surgery. 2008;14:699–705
- . Breast cancer management: is volume related to quality? Clinical Advisory Panel. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:1652–1659
- . Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:518–524
- . Surgeon characteristics and variation in treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2007;142:17–22
- . Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment in survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 1995;345:1265–1270
- . Patient and practice management processes among surgeons who treat breast cancer. Med Care. 2010;48:45–51
- . Racial differences in definitive cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospital where patients undergo surgery?. Med Care. 2009;47:765–773
- . The quality of early-stage breast cancer care. Ann Surg. 2000;232:220–224
- . Hospital variables associate with quality of care for breast cancer patients. JAMA. 1991;266:3429–3434
- . The importance of location in determining breast conservation rates. Am J Surg. 2005;190:18–22
- Anderson B, Kaufman C, Kiel K, Carlson C. Colloquium: ensuring optimal interdisciplinary breast care in the United States. American Society of Breast Disease. Available from: http://www.asbd.org/downloads/Colloquium/ASBD_Colloquium_Proceedings.pdf [accessed January 10, 2010].
- Calman K, Hine D. A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. A report by the expert advisory group on to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales; April 1995.
- . Trends in the treatment of breast cancer on Southeast England following the introduction of national guidelines. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006;28:215–217
- . The Calman-Hine report: a personal retrospective on the UK’s first comprehensive policy on cancer services. Lancet Oncol. 2006;794:336–346
- . Has Calman-Hine succeeded? Analysis of breast cancer procedure loads per consultant from before and after the Calman-Hine report. Breast. 2001;10:55–57
- Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operations on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:15–22
- Certification of breast centers in Germany: proof of concept for a prototypical example of quality assurance in multidisciplinary cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:228
- . Benchmarking the quality of breast cancer care in a nationwide voluntary system: the first five-year results (2003–2007) from Germany as a proof of concept. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:358
PII: S0960-9776(10)00066-4
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.03.012
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Breast
Volume 19, Issue 4
, Pages 297-302
, August 2010
