A radiologist’s perspective on efficiency and economics in a quality breast center

References 

1. Sickles EA. Xeromammography versus screen-film mammography – pros and cons of the two techniques. West J Med. 1981;134:273–274
   • MEDLINE
2. Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Fu KL, Fu YS. Diagnosis of diseases of the breast. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005;p. 3–27
3. Harris E. UCSF study shows breast cancer screening programs that interpret the most mammograms get the most precise results. http://chc.ucsf.edu/archives/interpretmammograms.htmMarch 5, 2002;[accessed 19.02.2010]
4. American Board of Radiology. Maintenance of certification. http://www.theabr.org/moc/moc_dr_landing.html [accessed 19.02.2010].
5. Mammography Education, Inc. http://www.mammographyed.com [accessed 19.02.2010].
6. Linver M, Paster S, Key C, Stidley C, King WV. Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in the community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology. 1992;184:39–43
   • MEDLINE
7. Linver M. Clinical performance in screening mammography: how we improve our expertise. Semin Breast Dis. 2003;6:128–132
   • CrossRef
8. National Consortium of Breast Centers, Inc. http://www.nqmbc.org/default.htm [accessed 19.02.2010].
9. Institute of Medicine . Saving women’s lives: strategies for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2005;http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11016[accessed 19.02.2010]
10. Institute of Medicine . Improving breast imaging quality standards. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2005;http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11308[accessed 19.02.2010]
11. Hayes E. Screening mammography practitioners consider Europe in the quest for better quality. Diagn Imaging. 2006;28–39
12. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, Kirkpatrick A, Chang S, Berbaum K, et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;5:369–375
13. Perry N. Interpretive skills in the National Health Service breast screening programme: performance indicators and remedial measures. Semin Breast Dis. 2003;6:108–113
    • CrossRef
14. Collins J. Good to great: why some companies make the leap…and others don’t. New York: Harper Collins; 2001;
15. Dernavich L. The right people on the bus stays the company’s course. Mass High Tech J New Engl Technol. April 26, 2004;http://www.loridernavich.com/Lori_Dernavich_Press_Room_files/LoriDernavich-MassHighTech.pdf[accessed 19.02.2010]
16. Levin R. Get the right people ‘on the bus’. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1167–1168
    • MEDLINE
17. Kolb G. Going filmless: lessons from a Swedish Breast Center. Imaging Econ. 2004;http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2004-08_08.asp[accessed 19.02.2010]
18. Kolb G. Integrate, innovate, imitate, surviving and thriving in the world of breast cancer economics. Breast J. 2005;11(Suppl. 1):S20–S23
    • CrossRef
19. Keen CE. Evaluating threshold screening mammograms: when to recall?. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?Sec=sup&Sub=wom&Pag=dis&ItemId=85770May 13, 2009;[accessed 19.02.2010]
20. Imaginis: Women’s Health Resource. Breast cancer: statistics on incidence, survival and screening. www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/statistics.asp [accessed 19.02.2010].
21. Tabár L, Tot T, Dean P. Breast cancer – the art and science of early detection with mammography: perception, interpretation, histopathologic correlation. New York: Thieme; 2004;p. 165–236
22. Chassin MR, Galvin RW, National Roundtable on Health Care Quality . The urgent need to improve health care quality – Institute of Medicine national roundtable on health care quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–1005
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
23. Casserly M. Understanding how women network – why women make small talk and men shoot straight. www.forbes.com/2009/10/07/networking-relationships-connections-forbes-women-entrepreneurs-men.html [accessed 19.02.2010].
24. Eklund GW. Efficiency in breast imaging. Semin Breast Dis. 2005;8:17–23
    • CrossRef
25. Burnside E, Park J, Fine J, Sisney G. The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography. AJR. 2005;185:790–796
26. Ellis R. Screening mammography: interpretation and reporting efficiencies. http://www.penrad.com/Literature/Articles/DrEllisDocument.pdf [accessed 19.02.2010].
27. Lee CZ. Comprehensive breast centers: priorities and pitfalls. Breast J. 1999;5:319–324
    • CrossRef
28. Kolb G. A complete overhaul. Imaging Econ. 2000;http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2000-05_03.asp[Accessed 19.02.2010]
29. Perry N, National mammography quality assurance advisory committee . An interview with Dr. Nicholas Perry. London: St. Bartholomew’s Hospital; September 27, 2007;http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4171b.htm[accessed 19.02.2010]
30. The American College of Radiology Accreditation Programs. http://www.acr.org/accreditation.aspx [accessed 19.02.2010].
31. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Ultrasound practice accreditation. http://www.aium.org/accreditation/brochure.pdf [accessed 19.02.2010].
32. American College of Surgeons. Stereotactic breast biopsy accreditation program. http://www.facs.org/cancer/breastbiopprog.html [accessed 19.02.2010].